WAEC GCE 2024 Literature Obj & Prose Answers

*mLITERATURE OBJ

01-10: ABDDAABCAA
11-20: BACDBCDDBA
21-30: BBBDAABBBC
31-40: BAABCDDDAD
41-50: DDCCABDDDB

*COMPLETED*✅

(1)
Francis’ work as a printer in Buchi Emecheta’s novel “Second Class Citizen” portrays him as a struggling and frustrated individual. His job is a symbol of his economic struggles and frustration with his circumstances. Despite working hard, he is unable to provide adequately for his family, leading to feelings of inadequacy and resentment.

The printing job also symbolizes Francis’ lack of personal fulfillment and ambition. He is stuck in a mundane and unfulfilling job, which reflects his limited aspirations and sense of hopelessness. Francis’ job is a routine and monotonous one, with little room for creativity or advancement. This lack of challenge and opportunity for growth contributes to his feelings of stagnation and frustration.

Furthermore, Francis’ work as a printer portrays his feelings of powerlessness and disillusionment. As a Nigerian immigrant in London, he faces racism and discrimination, which are exacerbated by his low-skilled job and limited opportunities for advancement. Francis’ job is a constant reminder of his marginalized status and the limited opportunities available to him.

In addition, Francis’ job as a printer highlights the tension between his traditional Nigerian values and the harsh realities of his life in London. As a husband and father, Francis feels a strong sense of responsibility to provide for his family, but his job makes it difficult for him to fulfill this role. This tension contributes to his feelings of frustration and disillusionment.

Overall, Francis’ work as a printer is a powerful symbol of his struggles and frustrations as a Nigerian immigrant in London. Through his job, Emecheta highlights the challenges faced by marginalized communities and the tension between traditional values and modern realities.

(2)
In “Second-Class Citizen,” the encounter between Mr. Okpara and Francis is significant as it serves to highlight the differences in attitudes towards ambition, education, and the roles of men and women within the Nigerian community, both in Nigeria and among immigrants in the United Kingdom. Mr. Okpara represents a more progressive viewpoint that values education and the empowerment of individuals, regardless of gender. His perspective contrasts sharply with that of Francis, who embodies traditional patriarchal views that prioritize male authority and often disregard the aspirations of women.

The encounter between Mr. Okpara and Francis in Buchi Emecheta’s “Second-Class Citizen” is a moment that underscores the clash between progressive and traditional values within the Nigerian community. This interaction is significant as it highlights the stark contrast in attitudes towards education, gender roles, and personal ambition. Mr. Okpara is portrayed as a character who values education and sees it as a tool for empowerment and social mobility.

His perspective represents a more modern, egalitarian viewpoint that challenges the status quo. In contrast, Francis embodies traditional patriarchal norms, placing little importance on Adah’s aspirations and educational pursuits. He views his role as the unquestioned head of the household, with little regard for the potential or desires of his wife.

This encounter is crucial as it reflects the broader societal tensions between maintaining traditional gender roles and embracing change that allows for the empowerment of women.

Mr. Okpara’s encouragement of Adah’s educational ambitions stands in stark opposition to Francis’s dismissive attitude, highlighting the internal and external conflicts Adah faces in her quest for self-actualization. Furthermore, this interaction serves to demonstrate the importance of allies and supportive figures in the journey toward gender equality.

Mr. Okpara’s progressive stance offers a vision of what could be possible for women like Adah, suggesting that change is attainable through education and the support of forward-thinking individuals.
In essence, this encounter not only emphasizes the personal struggle of the protagonist but also reflects the broader societal discourse on education, gender roles, and the potential for transformative change within communities. Through this narrative, Emecheta invites readers to consider the impact of cultural and societal attitudes on individual aspirations and the pursuit of equality.

(3)
In Alex Agyei-Agyiri’s novel “Unexpected Joy at Dawn”, the author employs several symbols to convey themes and ideas. Here’s an examination of the use of Massa’s sickness, the state of Korle Lagoon, and the Kantamanto market as symbols in the novel:

MASSA’S SICKNESS:
Massa’s sickness serves as a symbol for the decay and corruption that pervades Ghanaian society. Massa’s illness is a manifestation of the moral and spiritual decay that affects individuals and communities when they abandon their values and principles.

THE STATE OF KORLE LAGOON:
The polluted and filthy state of Korle Lagoon is a potent symbol for the environmental degradation and neglect that results from human actions. The lagoon’s condition reflects the consequences of unchecked industrialization, corruption, and lack of accountability.

THE KANTAMANTO MARKET:
The Kantamanto market represents a symbol of resilience, resourcefulness, and community. Despite the challenges and hardships faced by the market’s vendors and customers, the market remains a vibrant and thriving hub of activity. The market symbolizes the ability of individuals and communities to adapt and survive in the face of adversity.

In conclusion, these symbols in “Unexpected Joy at Dawn” serve as powerful commentary on the social, environmental, and economic issues that affect Ghanaian society. Through these symbols, Agyei-Agyiri critiques the corruption, neglect, and decay that threaten the well-being of individuals and communities, while also celebrating the resilience and resourcefulness of the human spirit.

(5)
The Brotherhood movement plays a remote role in precipitating the Harlem Race Riot, reflecting their manipulation of racial tensions for their ideological goals. The organization, while appearing to champion racial equality and social justice, ultimately prioritizes its own political agenda over the well-being of the Harlem community, leading to devastating consequences.

The Brotherhood’s relationship with Harlem is rooted in exploitation. They infiltrate the community under the guise of empowering it but instead use Harlem as a testing ground for their broader political theories. The Narrator, initially inspired by the Brotherhood’s rhetoric, becomes a prominent spokesperson for their cause. However, he gradually realizes that the Brotherhood views Harlem not as a community of individuals with genuine needs, but as a means to achieve their revolutionary goals. This detachment becomes evident when the Brotherhood shifts its focus away from Harlem, neglecting the growing discontent and unrest within the community.

The major moment that underscores the Brotherhood’s culpability in the riot occurs when the narrator discovers their deliberate strategy of abandoning Harlem to chaos. The Brotherhood decides that allowing tensions to escalate will serve their ideological objectives, even if it comes at the cost of lives and livelihoods. This calculated neglect exacerbates the frustrations of Harlem residents, who feel betrayed and ignored by an organization that claimed to advocate for them. The lack of leadership and guidance from the Brotherhood creates a vacuum, allowing anger and disillusionment to spiral into violence.

The Brotherhood’s manipulation of the narrator contributes to the riot’s outbreak. The narrator is initially tasked with rallying the community, but when he tries to address their immediate concerns, he is reprimanded and sidelined. The Brotherhood’s refusal to acknowledge the unique struggles of Harlem, coupled with their insistence on adhering to a rigid, impersonal ideology, alienates the community and deepens their resentment. This neglect fosters a sense of abandonment, igniting the very conditions that lead to the riot.

The Harlem Race Riot, therefore, is not just a spontaneous eruption of anger but a consequence of the Brotherhood’s strategic indifference and exploitation. By prioritizing their ideological goals over the needs of the people, the Brotherhood reveals their true nature as an organization driven by power rather than genuine social justice. The riot serves as a tragic culmination of their failures, highlighting the dangers of using marginalized communities as mere tools for political experimentation.